Page 176 of 248 FirstFirst ... 76126166169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183186226 ... LastLast
Results 1,751 to 1,760 of 2478

Thread: Coronavirus and the impact on football

  1. #1751
    Reports from Guinea say Keita and some teammates tested positive

  2. #1752
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    belfast
    Posts
    16,969
    Quote Originally Posted by stevie harkness View Post
    Reports from Guinea say Keita and some teammates tested positive
    I'd be interested to know how long he's had it.,as he's been bloody awful and that could be a reason .

  3. #1753
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    City of Self Doubt
    Posts
    16,839
    Quote Originally Posted by ianlfc View Post
    I'd be interested to know how long he's had it.,as he's been bloody awful and that could be a reason .
    Not unless he's had if for three years.
    Etiam si omnes, ego non

  4. #1754
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    belfast
    Posts
    16,969
    Quote Originally Posted by Balinkay View Post
    Not unless he's had if for three years.
    10 minutes, not bad 😂😂
    I'll line them up and you shoot them 😂😂

  5. #1755
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    belfast
    Posts
    16,969
    600 fans have been allowed in to watch the Northern Ireland match tonight (poor buggers)
    It's not many but it's a start.

  6. #1756
    Quote Originally Posted by Kev0909 View Post
    Shame we've got many players like that instead of having ones that we actually need (which is only a couple)

    Wish we could get rid of all of em, and get that CB people are on about, and maybe even some actual competition for Firmino... but yes not football manager etc
    Firmino 2 goals
    Playing more as a striker for Brasil.
    Firmino most used player for klopp
    242 games / 272

  7. #1757
    Quote Originally Posted by ianlfc View Post
    600 fans have been allowed in to watch the Northern Ireland match tonight (poor buggers)
    It's not many but it's a start.
    Haha... "allowed in "... torture!! 😜

  8. #1758
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    belfast
    Posts
    16,969
    Quote Originally Posted by dicko1969 View Post
    Haha... "allowed in "... torture!! 😜
    I think the same !!

    Though TBF I have friends and family who follow them everywhere and they have a brilliant time with a decent fan Base.

  9. #1759
    Legends in 1982

  10. #1760
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,170
    Quote Originally Posted by Taksin View Post
    https://unherd.com/2020/10/covid-experts-there-is-another-way/?pt

    Here's the great Barrington Declaration for anyone interested.




    As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical, and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.

    Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.

    Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

    Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.

    As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.

    The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.

    Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.

    Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.

    Great Barrington, Massachusetts, 4th October 2020
    People dying from corona virus are dying alone - very alone!
    I maintain that this illness is inhumane.
    From a relatively short search on the Great Barrington gang they appear to be a quite liberalist, right-wing organisation:

    https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2020/10/07/the-great-barrington-declaration-has-nothing-to-do-with-epidemiology-and-a-great-deal-to-do-with-far-right-economics/

    Do you agree?

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •