New pm

[redebreck]

The danger of an establishment approved Labour leader being elected PM is that they will pass Tory policy under the guise of Labour even the Tories wouldn't get away with or pass seemingly innocent policy that is by its designed prime for the Tories to absolutely rinse the shit out of when our media and establishment deems they are electable again

A good potential example would be, a public owned energy company, so the public purse pays for all the new infrastructure necessary to build up this new green energy company at massive expense and a glowing success is made of it, establishment Labour play pass the ball with the Tories and they privatise it, selling it off for a fraction of the cost the tax payer has paid for it for an instant high first week return for them and their pals

"some" people in the UK (could be many) are in fact crying out for some industries, including energy, to be nationalised.
I can't see Labour nationalising it and then allowing it to be privatised again. You seem very cynical about the UK Labour Party.
All I can say is the Welsh Labour Party would almost certainly disagree if the national Labour Party attempted something like that.

[scientificred]

Any plaudits for this new government ?

[Daffydd]

Any plaudits for this new government ?

No.

[redebreck]

Any plaudits for this new government ?

Unemployment down to a record 3%!
People out of work up to a record 20%.
Figure that one out - lies, damn lies, and statistics.

[CCTV]

Unemployment down to a record 3%!
People out of work up to a record 20%.
Figure that one out - lies, damn lies, and statistics.

I'd need a bit more to give it a go

But I'd imagine it's just a way of recoding people.
20% out of work, how can we kick them out of this group, unemployed, and into another category where they are coded differently.

Education programs, community employment, semi-state employment agencies, home carers, and internships.

Then after shipping them elsewhere, you've only 3% unemployed.

[vin]

I'd need a bit more to give it a go

But I'd imagine it's just a way of recoding people.
20% out of work, how can we kick them out of this group, unemployed, and into another category where they are coded differently.

Education programs, community employment, semi-state employment agencies, home carers, and internships.

Then after shipping them elsewhere, you've only 3% unemployed.

Exactly, it's an old trick in terms of classification. Put people into a mandatory "training" program and say they aren't unemployed

[Daffydd]

I read that a record number of people are not job-seeking because they are chronically ill, viva la long covid.

[Nineteenx]

Unemployment down to a record 3%!
People out of work up to a record 20%.
Figure that one out - lies, damn lies, and statistics.

Sounds equivalent to CCTVs attempts to portray Gomez as a top CB

[Daffydd]

Sounds equivalent to CCTVs attempts to portray Gomez as a top CB

I thought it was Virgil van Dijk that said that.

"He is, in my opinion, one of if not the best English centre-back around."

[Nineteenx]

I thought it was Virgil van Dijk that said that.

"He is, in my opinion, one of if not the best English centre-back around."

Until there is some actual defending to do? People refused to accept that a big part of our CBs prowess was our press and counter press being so good made it easy for them to see what was coming and the attempts to play forward we frequently limited other sides to required our CBs to win headers or a foot race only, now our press has gone to shit, how are my assertions looking?

Absolutely spot on and as astute as ever I'd say You're welcome