|
|
And he "could easily" have been a flop - still has to keep it going at that club to stay relevant but has been superb to date..
He hasn't naturally, been as much of a flop as your man Endo at Chelsea but there was always the risk.
Doing lot's of gymnastics in NOT answering the questions buster.. Come on 19 Surely you can do better than this. YOur special powers dude.. Those patterns..?
Come on
Mount is one of our ultimate swerves , he is terrible
He certainly looks that way - Klopp was a huge admirer though to be fair, make no mistake he was in for him before United stole a march.
Sad.. especially as I did not ever predict Bellingham would be a massive flop - Another lie almost as bad as the one about me saying Mount was better.
Sad time 19x whatever value you may have had is on the floor with multiple easy to prove lies.
It reads as though you’re saying us signing Mount instead of Bellingham would be like us signing Mo instead of Brandt
It actually pretty much comes out & makes that claim
Sids post
My response:
How is this saying Bellingham will be a massive flop? This is my response to sid - in part feeling a little subdued that we were not going in for Bellingham and that Mount was probably the more likely signing ... I suggested that he "Could easily" be an expensive flop - because that is the reality with so many high profile signings.
Now in your desperation to try and discredit me you are not only spinning and distorting things to suit a narrative you are actively telling fibs about me stating that Mount was the better player.. I have read the entire Thread..
It's a lie mate.. Pathetic. Simply because you have no answer to the questions I have put to you.
Bookmarks