Originally Posted by
Steveo
Seriously - batshit crazy.
Here’s TIA ratings and I think they are kind.
———————
Harvey Elliott – 6
A first real involvement for Elliott in a while and it maybe showed a little in terms of his early involvement.
Worked hard and got himself into the game more as it went on, but as could be expected, didn’t fare particularly well in terms of the defensive job behind Trent.
Jordan Henderson (on for Elliott, 62′) – 4
Dismal. Lost the ball too easily and certainly didn’t win it back.
————————
Now these are all subjective. BUT we all know which posters would be killing Elliott or Thiago had they come on at 3:1 and presided over that shot show to allow than back to 3:3.
Yet the stats show Hendo didn't lose the ball once and Elliott was dispossessed 3 times and lost it once more through poor control meaning he lost it a total of 4 FOUR times and didn't make a single tackle so HE didn't do anything to win it back
It's why I genuinely wet myself laughing when you try and push those clowns as a credible source look at the stats, they have really clear bias' on who they like and who they don't, remember when they wrote about Thiago having played a brilliant ball in behind for Salah and it was actually a ball he overhit it and with top spin so it ran out of play and Mo never had any chance of reaching it
Mine are actual stats of each players contribution, not an opinion from a bias source, so yes the TIA lads are Batshit crazy indeed and if they are so incapable of writing without such obvious bias, they should just give it up
Edit: Had hendo been dispossessed or lost it through poor control, it would show in the dispossessed stats and UnsTch stats, but it doesn't, showing TIA up for the wankers they are I'm afriad
Last edited by Nineteenx; 30th April 2023 at 08:02 PM.
"If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”
Bookmarks