Reply With QuoteNo, I'm not kidding. Looks like others aren't either. The Jones sending off is a 50/50. Some are given some aren't for that.Originally Posted by Nineteenx
Are you kidding?
|
|
|
First Team
Are you fucking kidding this is turning into an absolute farce and clear show of targeted victimisation of our club and players
Webb the FA PGMOL and FA are completely out of control
That was an absolute shit show of very obvious corruption on Saturday, an absolute fucking disgrace that we should be asking FIFA and UEFA to intervene on given how ridiculously far they have gone, they stand down their bent as fuck officials for ONE game and ban Jones for 3 for a decision they got very wrong and look to ban Mac Allister for 3 for saying 12th man
We need to go to FIFA and UEFA for help, ask for FIFA or UEFA to appoint their own none FA PGMOL officials for our games
They all need to watch themselves too i'd reckon, they are plunging to depths that might see someone do something really stupid like kick the living shit out of one or a few of them imo these sort of things happen when you are the constant target of official or ruling bodies like this, it's how and why revolutions or regime changes start
"If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”
First Team
No, I'm not kidding. Looks like others aren't either. The Jones sending off is a 50/50. Some are given some aren't for that.
Are you kidding?
First Team
It's not a 50/50 and there was not excessive force, i wouldn't expect anything more than a yellow card for any player at any club for that and would even consider that harsh as it was a complete accident with no hint of intent, excessive force or recklessness about it
"If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”
First Team
Harsh yes, completly agree. But in today's football world and how the "danger" of the tackle is amplified by the replays I didn't see it being rescinded.
I think it's one of those that one ref gives and another doesn't. So for me it's a 50/50 if its given or not. The VAR didn't help with that final still image that you have to admit looks dangerous. That's all it needed for the card to change and for the FA to up hold it.
First Team
Agree.
I think if that's against us I don't think there's so much leniency, we would want a red card. It's accidental but in the game now a studs up situation that makes contact is more than likely getting a red card. Doesn't have to be deliberate to be classed as dangerous,that's where the grey area is. Intent should be a factor but it more than likely isn't taken into account.
...shows his class...
Isn't that still image - something everyone could see on the screen - something outside the protocols for a review?
It's as if the VAR team were determined that a red card be shown. The still image could be said to be out of context for the incident.
Yet another example of the complete stitch-up.
First Team
I think your right in that a still image shouldn't be used as part of VAR protocols. Maybe that's where we thought we would get off with it. But for me, as far as the tackle goes. I think sometimes they are given as red and sometimes as yellow. It wasn't the worst decision made on the day for me(outside of the offside obviously).
Old Codger
They shouldn’t use slow-motion in these reviews either… always looks ten times worse.
I bet you can squeal like a pig!
First Team
Klopps called for a replay
...shows his class...
Thinking back to the first red card, a spuds player (deliberately) held Curtis Jones back immediately before the challenge.
That holding back in itself caused Jones to have to stretch and for his foot to slip off the top of the ball. Doesn't anybody with a modicum of sense take something like that into consideration? Or was it the case that VAR (deliberately) omitted that from the footage shown to the referee?
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks