|
|
Just been searching for this thread.. Since it will be used again next week ..
Out of interest,for those in the know.if Man-city are banned for a year or 2..Is there any rule against the Man-city owners putting 300/400 million of their own money into transfers? I think it would be unfair if they are able to go out and buy a 100 million pound striker to take Aguero place when hes unavailable.. It would be no punishment at all, if they can still spend unlimited funds.
Cleaning up the Scots since the 13th century
I guess City can spend whatever they want if they dont want to play European football.
If they spent £100m on a striker it would still be on the accounts for the next 3 years so not sure it is that easy...however if Abu Dubai airlines were to sponsor them £700m per season who knows !
Thanks I wasn't sure how it worked. I didn't realize. transfers were tied into Europe. Even though a team is not able to get into the competition.
Cleaning up the Scots since the 13th century
I'd assume that if they pour 400m into transfers, they'd get banned for the 2022/2023 season since a club's loss is calculated over 3 years I think.
Etiam si omnes, ego non
They're spending millions on the best lawyers trying to get out of the shit they're in now, if they succeed no doubt they'll spend a load more to find a way to buy whoever they want.
Replace Aguero with Mbappe?.....no problem Sheikh.
Buy another 6 fullbacks for Pep?......no problem Sheikh.
"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass.........and I'm all out of bubblegum."
Just to take our minds off last Thursday night....
https://youtu.be/I46Yxmbc1HU
Offender Of The Offended...!!
It`s Better To Reign In Hell, Than Serve In Heaven!
"If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”
Bookmarks