Page 17 of 41 FirstFirst ... 710111213141516171819202122232427 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 410

Thread: Manchester City banned

  1. #161
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    50,258
    Quote Originally Posted by Martyboy View Post
    C'mon Kev bumming aint just for gays ya know!!....Bummed my missus and ex-missus(and other lovely ladies in me past loads of times!!)....Can't beat it mun!!..(Welsh accent coming out there)...... The only downside is the occasional bit of sweetcorn on your nudger when you pull him out!!...triumphant:
    LOL you tell him Marty, he's been missing out, have you never seen City Of God and the famous banana scene? I tell ya, our Brazilian lads will know all about the virtues of a bumming for sure

    Marcelinha Moraes was always a big favourite of mine in the porn stakes, she was my absolute favourite
    Last edited by Nineteenx; 15th February 2020 at 11:37 PM.
    "If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”

  2. #162
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Anxiety Avenue in Tinnitus Town
    Posts
    5,662
    Quote Originally Posted by Nineteenx View Post
    LOL you tell him Marty, he's been missing out, have you never seen City Of God and the famous banana scene? I tell ya, our Brazilian lads will know all about the virtues of a bumming for sure

    Marcelinha Moraes was always a big favourite of mine in the porn stakes, she was my absolute favourite
    Haha...Have to be honest,not heard or seen of her I must admit.....As for bananas all I can say is he was a good tag team mate of mine once or twice with my lady of choice at the time....

  3. #163
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    25,055
    Who do we fancy will replace Guardiola when he inevitably disappears to Juventus?

    Pochettino? Rodgers?
    Your hobbies are rollerblading and you're also a bit of a rat-hound? Steel Wool
    Sid knows he's crazy and he likes it. Balinkay

  4. #164
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    50,258
    Quote Originally Posted by Insidious View Post
    Who do we fancy will replace Guardiola when he inevitably disappears to Juventus?

    Pochettino? Rodgers?
    It HAS to be The Owl, he'll steady the ship
    "If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”

  5. #165
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    12,007
    Quote Originally Posted by Insidious View Post
    Who do we fancy will replace Guardiola when he inevitably disappears to Juventus?

    Pochettino? Rodgers?
    Neither of those, they don't win trophies, not in a decent league anyway (Rodgers)
    If you're not sure what to do with the ball, just put it in the net, and we'll talk about the other options later... Bob Paisley.

  6. #166
    It'll be interesting to see what City base their appeal on. So far all they've come out with is the usual paranoid whine about the whole world being biased against them (this from the club whose supporters sing 'Always the victim' at us). I can't see that flying somehow.

    I wouldn't have believed it possible but Danny Murphy made even less sense than usual when asked about this on MOTD, "It'd be good for the game if City win their appeal and get reinstated. Because it can't be just City who are guilty of this. Other clubs must be guilty as well. So if City are banned it will create a snowball effect"

    It will only create a 'snowball effect' if other clubs are guilty of what City have just been found guilty of i.e. submitting falsified accounts and basically lying to UEFA to get round FFP. I'm not aware of any other club even suspected of doing that. But if there are other clubs guilty of that then they bloody well should be snowballed out of European competition as well.

    Try applying Murphy's logic to any other form of law breaking. Burglary, for example:

    "It'd be good for society if that burglar wins his appeal and gets let out. After all, he can't be the only burglar around. Other people must have burgled houses as well so if we lock this burglar up it will just create a snowball effect".

    Danny Murphy talking out of his arse. Well blow me down! Who'd have thought it, eh??

  7. #167
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    50,258
    Quote Originally Posted by Sterome77 View Post
    It'll be interesting to see what City base their appeal on. So far all they've come out with is the usual paranoid whine about the whole world being biased against them (this from the club whose supporters sing 'Always the victim' at us). I can't see that flying somehow.

    I wouldn't have believed it possible but Danny Murphy made even less sense than usual when asked about this on MOTD, "It'd be good for the game if City win their appeal and get reinstated. Because it can't be just City who are guilty of this. Other clubs must be guilty as well. So if City are banned it will create a snowball effect"

    It will only create a 'snowball effect' if other clubs are guilty of what City have just been found guilty of i.e. submitting falsified accounts and basically lying to UEFA to get round FFP. I'm not aware of any other club even suspected of doing that. But if there are other clubs guilty of that then they bloody well should be snowballed out of European competition as well.

    Try applying Murphy's logic to any other form of law breaking. Burglary, for example:

    "It'd be good for society if that burglar wins his appeal and gets let out. After all, he can't be the only burglar around. Other people must have burgled houses as well so if we lock this burglar up it will just create a snowball effect".

    Danny Murphy talking out of his arse. Well blow me down! Who'd have thought it, eh??
    A fine analysis of Murphy

    I honestly think as football is a business and Champions League football can be worth 100-220m to clubs, then it should be made a criminal offence for clubs to try and circumvent FFP as UAE FC have tried to, they are denying other clubs a potential 100-220m through their false accounting to be allowed to continue in the competition and also denying other clubs opportunities to make more revenue by cheating the system and playing in the competition with a financially doped squad contrary to FFP rules

    Criminal investigations should include access to the books of their alleged sponsors and image rights companies to forensically check that the money these alleged sponsors and partners are paying to UAE FC is not being pumped into them through the back door by UAE FC's owners
    Last edited by Nineteenx; 16th February 2020 at 02:40 AM.
    "If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”

  8. #168
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    50,258
    If we were to do an MBappe deal that was only made possible by a legitimate sponsor, Nike, striking a deal to pay image rights or larger sums for his endorsement to the player to make the deal possible, I've no doubt people would call foul, but that would be an entirely different thing, that would be a genuine sponsor seeing a considerable benefit in a leading world player who endorses their products being at a specific team and not financial doping by way of our owners pumping their own money into the club through dubious methods
    "If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”

  9. #169
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,425
    So if I assume when man city take over, they inject more billion in, it wouldn't have thisbproblem right ? It become their capital not outsource sponsor

  10. #170
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    50,258
    TWO seasons TWO SEASONS! ! !



    Fair play to Sky Sports for once, they were actually playing the exact footage from this gif taking the piss all night last night too
    "If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •