|
|
1. based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.
Has anyone else spotted the case for the prosecution and the fundamental flaw in the use of the term subjective yet?
Genuine question here, if certain fouls and types of fouls are considered penalties or free kicks by referees or VAR officials on the grounds of their personal feelings, tastes or opinions, then that surely means those officials will arrive at the same decisions for the same, almost identical types of fouls in the same positions, it stands to reason and makes perfect logical sense, if the argument some decisions are subjective, then if he's faced with that foul again in a practically identical situation, using his subjectivity he surely arrives at the same decision
"If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”
Bookmarks