Match Thread : Crystal Palace v Liverpool

[vin]

Well don't complain next time something goes against us if you think that's fine

I guess we should just not care and accept the standard of officials instead

Missed my point. It's a fallback situation. We've had decisions go for us and against us. Until it's sorted that's just the way it's going to be. It's now no different from when a ref (pre-VAR) got decisions wrong. The technology works, the human interpretation doesn't.

[Steveo]

Why is it when something goes in our favour its put under a microscope , yet when Man-city get given a win at Wolves for a nonexistant penalty its FINE? We were winning the game 2-1 at the time. Man-city were level and won the game 1-0.


There is an agenda against us. You just need to look at the Tv Schedule for that.. Burnley get to play on the Tuesday we get to play on the Thursday against Leicester then we have Burnley away on the Sunday. Its all about making us tired so we drop points and then everyone else is GLEEFUL.. And mancity are going for their 4 title in 5 years and they still get to play first before us. meaning we are always behind in points.

Probably because we were only winning due to an error by the officials.

If people want to stick to us winning because is was 1:2 then you have to look at the second goal.

I cringe at this persecution complex

[vin]

What a signing

I'm not familiar with this concept. Can you explain further?

[justme]

Probably because we were only winning due to an error by the officials.

we were already 2-1 up

[Steveo]

Missed my point. It's a fallback situation. We've had decisions go for us and against us. Until it's sorted that's just the way it's going to be. It's now no different from when a ref (pre-VAR) got decisions wrong. The technology works, the human interpretation doesn't.

True - as long as a fallible human being is involved in the process then the technology can be as sophisticated as it likes - it too produces many errors in the end

[Steveo]

we were already 2-1 up

Yes - could it be that you have not yet seen - Bobby was offside for our second goal?



We are only discussing it because we got the goals. If this was United you would all be in total agreement that instead of 1:3 scores should have been 1:1 and a conspiracy was in play. Unless we are imagining scenarios.

[Steveo]

For balance here is the bitter ex BS defending us that Bobby was onside - WHEN HE WAS v Villa

[Steveo]

I'm not familiar with this concept. Can you explain further?

signing


noun
1.
the action of writing one's signature on an official document.
"the signing of the Anglo–French agreement to build Concorde"


In this case his 'signing' of a contract to play for Liverpool Football Club

[Kev0909]

Missed my point. It's a fallback situation. We've had decisions go for us and against us. Until it's sorted that's just the way it's going to be. It's now no different from when a ref (pre-VAR) got decisions wrong. The technology works, the human interpretation doesn't.

It seems you've missed my point

"Until it's sorted"

Well accepting shite like that is not going to get it sorted any quicker, just because it's in favour of us doesn't make it right, and vice-versa.

Also for a neutral fan that killed the game too, otherwise it would of been a good end,. (for everyone else but us)

[vin]

signing


noun
1.
the action of writing one's signature on an official document.
"the signing of the Anglo–French agreement to build Concorde"


In this case his 'signing' of a contract to play for Liverpool Football Club

Ah...been so long, I had forgotten