Jota ran away from the ball, think that's obvious... could and should of done better really.
(even tho he won a dodgy pen)
|
|
That's all hypothetical and not what happened though, using a situation where the keeper comes out of his box changes it completely. The ball went out of play and Jota was never getting it, thats where the situation/positioning has to be taken into account. Surely the ref should look at think he wasn't getting to it, a scoring opportunity hasn't been denied therefore there's no penalty.
Jota moves towards the keeper, away from the direction ball is actually travelling so I'm puzzled as to how you're saying it's a natural movement and not trying to draw the foul which most forwards do in that situation.
As for Robertson being unlucky. Really? It's dangerous play, a red card all day. We haven't been done over by VAR more than anyone else has.
Jota ran away from the ball, think that's obvious... could and should of done better really.
(even tho he won a dodgy pen)
#FSGOUT
we are liverpool football club, not fucking norwich.
Focusing on semantics a little here. Line of sight was not the right term (my mistake) - but Taksin, it's worse than that. As mentioned he can't even look at Ox because of Bobby. That's the whole point. He is 100% unequivocally interfering/affecting with play/move/attack, so much so the keeper can't even look to his left OR move to his left until the ball passes Firmino... and that is WHY Ox has the time and space to score.
Surely this doesn't need explanation. We can all see it.
Take the hit like a man. We got the goals we shouldn't have had within the rules. Enjoy the win. Arguing that the. goal or Penalty were legit is a little pathetic
And as far as I know the rule is about interfering. The goal is ruled on or off on the basis of whether the player is interfering/affecting the play directly as he defends the goal. That doesn't mean that Virgil picking his bum on the half way line is doing the same. Again you are using words to wriggle out of what we can all see
as I keep saying, it was a dummy. If he had hooked the ball to come with him (which I think he actually tried to do), it would have gone towards the keeper. By leaving it, he allowed it to go around the keeper. He just couldn't get to it as he was brought down.
My hypothetical was straightforward. Are you allowed to stop someone in their tracks if they've cleverly fooled you by letting the ball run past you? the answer is no as far as I'm aware. It doesn't matter if it's the goalie or someone else. The scenario I described is helpful because he was also the last man in on goal. If its outside the box, that carries a red card - in the case of Hyypia, the red has also been shown inside the box in addition to the penalty, much to my chagrin.
I don't think he moved to his right to draw a foul (so we disagree). I think it was a natural movement based on the attacking play. I also don't think it is obvious that he could not have made further contact with the ball (so we disagree). But penalties can be given even if the attacker is running away from goal inside the box. The question is whether it was a foul, not whether he would have gone on to score or even reached the ball.
As I said during the game, 'never a pen', but I have thought about it and can see why it was given now. It's not like they didn't take their time over it
Not true. If Bobby was onside he would have to take into account Oxlade, especially as the ball was going to him and was not going to Firmino.
And I enjoyed the game as much as the next man, thanks very much. This is a purely theoretical exercise. It's called a disagreement. You seem a bit more anxious to claim victory than anyone else
Talking about bias and seeing the balanced - who spoiler alert agree with you 😲
A player who is offside by their mere existence of being offside isn't always deemed to be offside.
A defender can make a play and that makes an offside person onside.
An offside player can be deemed to have not made a material impact on a play.
You can say your version of football rules are better and argue for your rules. But the actual rules are a different matter.
Last night Robbo passes to Ox who scores. Bobby in an offside position attempts to challenge for the ball, he doesn't make contact. It's deemed to be an immaterial influence and the goal stands.
Bookmarks