Liverpool transfers in/out and rumours 22/23 + Contracts

[fagin]

Because they won't pay vastly more than what they think a player is worth?

I fully agree with you but dickering around for the length of time we have over a couple or few mill then deciding to pay more than they had to pay weeks earlier is not good business more desperation instead of just moving on.

[fagin]

we don't have one... But to think its come to this. a 19 year old whos only played an handful of games in the top division will cost 55 million if he goes to Chelsea. its mental.. 55 million would pay for nearly every squad in the 5th tier or something like that

Some whole Championship teams were assembled for less

[justme]

Regarding Trents comments.. lets face the fking facts here all this change in approach is simple for HIM. so TRENT can play inside when he wants too. when we get a DM can we please just go back to a proper 433 with our fullbacks bombing down the sides, its the best suited to us and it works and further more most goals come on Taa's side in fact all of them do right now

stop pandering to anyone and do whats best for the team... if we do go back to the best system you can have Konate help Taa to defend on the right side. but not be the only defender there when Trent is half way up the pitch

[JockStrap]

we don't have one... But to think its come to this. a 19 year old whos only played an handful of games in the top division will cost 55 million if he goes to Chelsea. its mental.. 55 million would pay for nearly every squad in the 5th tier or something like that

A shooting starn shoots pineapples wi' a machinegun.

[JockStrap]

I fully agree with you but dickering around for the length of time we have over a couple or few mill then deciding to pay more than they had to pay weeks earlier is not good business more desperation instead of just moving on.

How are they doing that? Transfers are complex negeotations once you get into tens of millions of pounds. You make it sound like it's buying a packet of sweets. It's clearly not.

[jr81]

How are they doing that? Transfers are complex negeotations once you get into tens of millions of pounds. You make it sound like it's buying a packet of sweets. It's clearly not.

We reportedly offered 48mil,theybwanted 50mil. We haggled for 2 mil.

They offered a vastly over inflated price for caicedo. Something doesn't add up.

[jr81]

I fully agree with you but dickering around for the length of time we have over a couple or few mill then deciding to pay more than they had to pay weeks earlier is not good business more desperation instead of just moving on.

Agreed. But then offered a vastly over inflated price for a player that didn't want to come to us.. Its clueless.

[JockStrap]

We reportedly offered 48mil,theybwanted 50mil. We haggled for 2 mil.

They offered a vastly over inflated price for caicedo. Something doesn't add up.

As I said they are negeotations. If "it's only 2m" then why didn't Brighton take £48m?

[JockStrap]

Agreed. But then offered a vastly over inflated price for a player that didn't want to come to us.. Its clueless.

What do you value Caicedo at?

[jr81]

As I said they are negeotations. If "it's only 2m" then why didn't Brighton take £48m?

Because they are the selling club and they wanted 50mil..