Liverpool transfers in/out and rumours 22/23 + Contracts

[Kev0909]

go and have drink and calm you're nerves . you seem constantly angry

Not my fault you don't have any brain cells

[Kev0909]

was one of them shows on youtube when they had someone talking about the contracts.

That's great, 100% true then.

[justme]

its came from someone called David Lynch.. i think hes close to the club and gets to hear things.

[JockStrap]

In terms of 'value' to the club Trent is 'worth' the most.

We'll get another 6 or 7 years out of him.

And between now and then he will still retain a decent transfer fee should we wish to sell him.

However Trent is the 'easiest' to replace. We'll have a far easier chance of replacing a fullback compared to finding a left-footed right winger or a generational centre half.

Replacing VVD and Mo is going to be virtually impossible whether they leave at the end of this season or in a year or two's time.

18 goals and 81 assists suggest otherwise.

[jozza800]

18 goals and 81 assists suggest otherwise.

If we go back to playing with more traditional fullbacks then we'll be fine.

[JockStrap]

If we go back to playing with more traditional fullbacks then we'll be fine.

And if we go back to playing with traditional strikers we'll be fine. Unfortunately it's not that easy.

We have a world class attacking right back in the team. Replacing him will be just as difficult as replacing Salah or VVD.

[justincredible]

If we go back to playing with more traditional fullbacks then we'll be fine.

Get Dirk Hebel on the phone...

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/dirk-hebel/beraterfirma/berater/8547

[Insidious]

If we go back to playing with more traditional fullbacks then we'll be fine.

There are plenty of stats that us mere mortals don't have easy access to that go into a deeper dive of how a side might be functioning.

I'd absolutely love to see some sort of quantitative data (and have it broken down for me) into how much better-off (or worse off!) we would be by having a high-quality, defensive-minded player in that position under instruction to lock down their side, versus what Trent offers.

That's not to say I think we would be better for having a different player or set-up. I'm just curious about it. How many chances we concede versus how many we create and so on.

[CCTV]

🚨(&#127765 |
@FabrizioRomano
: With Van Dijk, Trent, and Salah, the situation remains the same. They are negotiating but there is no breakthrough in talks.😬

↪️Conversations are still ongoing and I can guarantee all three players are giving priority to Liverpool.



According to our Fabrizio the ball is in FSG’s court, most probably on length of contract for the two old boys and I can only think it’s purely financial with Trent.

Trent rumours are real essentially. I'd not be shocked if he moves !! Which is quiet shocking.
I know it's all money and power play, but he should be signed up before Xmas.

Virgil, not seen any rumours of where'd he'd be off to yet, think he stays.

Salah will have a few options. Given he's so well paid compared with everyone else bar Trent at LFC, expect real hard balling.
He is ageing and a big wage. His movement is great, but it relies on pace. An ageing Salah presently would still get a big pay-day elsewhere. PsG, Saudi, even Real might sign him up for 2 years.

Losing players on free contracts is bad for the cashbook obviously. But it affords greater wiggle room in terms of ffp accounting bizarrely.
Say Trents valued at 70 mill, and smelly old real offer £30mill in January. We take £30mill, he's off and were £30mill better off
Or
We say, no, he signs a pre-contract, he's off in the summer to Madrid 🤢🤮 we get £0, Nada, zip. We lose a £70mill player for nowt. Under ffp this counts as £70mill credit/revenue. We're £40mill better off under ffp.
I'm take the £30mill in January generally. Cash in and move on.

[Kev0909]

Trent rumours are real essentially. I'd not be shocked if he moves !! Which is quiet shocking.
I know it's all money and power play, but he should be signed up before Xmas.

Virgil, not seen any rumours of where'd he'd be off to yet, think he stays.

Salah will have a few options. Given he's so well paid compared with everyone else bar Trent at LFC, expect real hard balling.
He is ageing and a big wage. His movement is great, but it relies on pace. An ageing Salah presently would still get a big pay-day elsewhere. PsG, Saudi, even Real might sign him up for 2 years.

Losing players on free contracts is bad for the cashbook obviously. But it affords greater wiggle room in terms of ffp accounting bizarrely.
Say Trents valued at 70 mill, and smelly old real offer £30mill in January. We take £30mill, he's off and were £30mill better off
Or
We say, no, he signs a pre-contract, he's off in the summer to Madrid 🤢🤮 we get £0, Nada, zip. We lose a £70mill player for nowt. Under ffp this counts as £70mill credit/revenue. We're £40mill better off under ffp.
I'm take the £30mill in January generally. Cash in and move on.

So CCTV the wise, how does a player get valiued under FFP? how can anyone say how much a player is worth??

Load of tosh.