"Bringing the game into disrepute" lol
|
|
Hmmm A little odd, I guess it's simply a charge of being abusive to the assistant not in terms of what was said, but the volume and intensity of what was saidKlopp has been charged with a breach of FA rule E3, which covers "comments which are improper, which bring the game into disrepute, which are threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting".
That's the only thing it can be as City's claims about his pre-game comments are just them throwing their toys out of their pram because they lost - His comments about decisions at Arsenal aren't bringing the game into disrepute, it was Michael Oliver and Darren England who did that by making corrupt incorrect decisions
As for not being able to compete financially, well, our owners don't make nearly as much funding available to him as they should do
City were not cleared of fiddling FFP, their ban was rescinded because 2 of the 3 lawyers ruled the evidence that proved they were guilty was inadmissible (out of time), so to every single football person, media person, financial expert, they were bound to rights guilty as sin, as charged by UEFA
"If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”
"Bringing the game into disrepute" lol
Did jurgen use some foul and abusive language?
I know right, you'd think for failure to apply the laws of the game, endangering player health and safety and being corrupt as fuck in general it should be PGMOL and its officials charged with bringing the game into disrepute, especially after the referees guilty of that are never discipline, reprimanded or removed from their positions or at the bare minimum from officiating Premier League games in any capacity
"If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”
Good to see someone say it as it is and all the better (last few minutes) for calling Howe out, describing him as "a midget of a man" compared to Klopp.
Of course the type of fans that gets their *ahem* "knowledge" from Micah Richards/Danny Murphy etc won't pay it any heed (or even see it) but there are still a few good Eggs left in the journalistic basket.
Your hobbies are rollerblading and you're also a bit of a rat-hound? Steel Wool
Sid knows he's crazy and he likes it. Balinkay
Howe will be sacked eventually. having never won anything has a manager and never will
Cleaning up the Scots since the 13th century
Seriously though. Jurgen did well enough not to deck the linesman. How the guy could not see Bernado Silva drag Salah by his collar around his throat area nearly strangling him. Beggars' belief then again he did see. just decided i wont bother.
Cleaning up the Scots since the 13th century
Jurgen Klopp has been fined £30,000 for his sending-off against Manchester City. The Liverpool manager has not been given a touchline ban
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________
They couldn't ban him because he had a point
Cleaning up the Scots since the 13th century
At the time of the pedo priests being revealed, it would have been a curious thought to think a minister for children could just say no comment, for a year suspended sentence to a gay pal presenting as a good samaritan turned sex monster some 20 odd years later. Whilst homeless children were knowingly being sexually exploited throughout the decade.
There was a high prevalence of gay child sex abuse in the church after all. Though not representative of the wider public. One of the more curious differences between gay and straight men, is the higher prevalence of child/minor sex abuse in gays than straights, whilst otherwise gay men seem less violent, aggressive or dangerous. Less likely to kill a child for example. Perhaps its down to the societal attitudes around boys & girls. Of course many more straight guys than gay guys, so hyperfocusing on gays isn't wise.
Sadly the sentencing of 5 years for the girls in state care was met with outrage, similar to pedo priests who often got the same or similar sentencing. It didnt capture the imagination though in the same way.
In 20 plus years, the justice system has retained its sense of justice apparently. 5 years for buggering/raping children in state care, still doesn't seem well balanced to my eye.
Its curious how the public psyche works. We're a nation who've bankrolled debt onto future generations, then removed their right to life to protect rape victims from the justice system that remains in place.
One that still fails victims of pedo sex crimes, who waive their right to anonymity due to the sentencing at the hands of the judiciary. Dublin a hotspot for pedo tourism in Europe sadly. Then offer anonymity to such pedos, so they aren't targeted by vigilantes. Of course this has led to access to more kids of uninformed parents. He seemed kind, offered to mind the kids... omg wtf..
2% of the population has a genetic predisposition for paedophilia. These people will be drawn to working with kids, some unaware of their predisposition, others aware.
So these people are more likely found in the "good" sectors of society that help kids, the social workers, teachers, creche, doctors and carers, psychologists, sports coaches, police, lgbtq activists - our new church/clergy, though there are gays against groomers and such against lgbtqism: more the kids need kink and bondage experiences.
Of course many non-pedos in these sectors too. But these type of professions offer the access.
Then you have fellas who prey on single mums, so they can target the child. Mum n daughter types, mom n son types.
It seems, whilst alot of child sex abuse occurs in the home, statistically they are the least risk to their child, and of course it's ususally the male/father not the mom whose a risk. They just have the most opportunity. Increasing access to kids for non-parents sadly just increases their risk, especially for single mums.
These are difficult topics, but rape victims, particularly children are so badly treated here and yonder, you have to give them a voice.
Bookmarks