|
|
Surprised city haven't gone for him
Aguero long term replacement? - Different style but still
UTD are pretty sorted in attack, scary with the money they have it's sorted for years, means they can spend money elsewhere like they have in midfield.
Just defense and goalie next for them (and to be fair that henderson is decent)
Like it or not other teams are looking good for future, while our best players are aging and we're bringing noone in.
Last edited by Kev0909; 8th September 2020 at 09:42 AM.
More stupid rumours that Brewster could be sold for 20 million..Either hes gonna be a top star or not.. You really cant decide yet. hes not had chance to prove himself.
Cleaning up the Scots since the 13th century
Rhian Brewster: Liverpool considering selling 20-year-old with buy-back clause
Liverpool are considering allowing Rhian Brewster to leave on a permanent deal in this transfer window, with the possible protection of a buy-back clause.
Fuck off
Prune prune prune the squad gentley down the streammmmmm didlly diddly didly doo VVD is playing as CF
Last edited by Kev0909; 8th September 2020 at 01:55 PM.
Can you please explain how net spending £76 million over 5 years or £15 million a season has left the club with no disposable income ?
@SwissRamble said
"However, here’s the thing. Much of the revenue growth has been eaten up by higher costs. In fact. Since 2015 #LFC wages have grown 87% (£144m), i.e. at a faster rate than revenue 79% (£235m), the highest in the Big 6, due to recruiting better players and higher bonus payments."
Id suggest the above paragraph is slightly less accurate/bad now than at that particular time.
The actual growth, revenue minus wages, leaves the club with a greater sum of profit £91million.
How could the club invest more on signing players in the 5 years prior to Klopps arrival than after 5 years of success on the pitch ?
I gather wages have risen with revenue but they are still under 60% of turnover and that is somewhat normal enough. Also our wages include all staff.
I will be interested to know who the club belongs too when the club itself as paid off the debt from the take over.. it seems to me that the owners have paid back the debts by the clubs income itself. I could be wrong on that but it seems like that to me.
Cleaning up the Scots since the 13th century
The footballing juggernaut that is Aston Villa have just signed Brentford striker Ollie Watkins for a club record £28m that could rise to £33m.
One day lads. One day.
So any purchases and sales have to come from selling our assets. to get back money for other trasnfers. The owners are basically not putting any money in at all. So if Klopp wanted to buy an expensive player,He would personally put the club in debt..
Would explain why the owners wanted to furlough the staff. they wanted a cheaper way and not coughing up money. I wonder how long this will continue for? looks like we will have to sell the likes of Mane and Salah to get money for other transfers.
Cleaning up the Scots since the 13th century
I think money is available but possibly not much it is clear we are being very careful/tight depending on your view point.
I am looking at what most other big clubs are doing and it seems like they are taking the same approach.
What is weird is Newcastle/Villa/Leeds are spending big could pay off but could be a huge gamble if the season is cut short or they get relegated.
Just said the same thing to a pal of mine.
Sell to buy after the CL and prem in successive seasons.
Fuck sake, imagine what next season will be like if we dont win anything this coming season.
People can say we might pull something out of the bag that we've done on the quiet but everything at the moment points to the "skint" side of things. Actually, not skint. Just unwilling to spend what they know they should.
Bookmarks