I was more annoyed by the fact Son was offside yet their goal stood, even though VAR looked at it
|
|
They didn't even have a look at it. Does someone have to make an appeal for him to look at it or what?
there was anther shot from the edge of the box, can't remember who but I think it as Salah and it was rising into the arm that was held down, which sort of broke the shot. Neither were pens in the olden days but both looked inescapable to me under current rules.
I was more annoyed by the fact Son was offside yet their goal stood, even though VAR looked at it
It looks offside because he is offside.
Really scratching my head here - HOW can that be given..?
If its a toe onside. where does the armpit come in to the equation? its all nonsense. Anyway looked offside
Cleaning up the Scots since the 13th century
Not sure on the offside on in all honesty. Have too look at it again. In the frame they chose he looks marginally on to me.
Re pens: No idea. I guess they took a glancing look at it and decided it wasn't worth a prolonged analysis. I can't remember the second incident to which you referred @Taks. Will have to look at the highlights later.
Etiam si omnes, ego non
It was actually onside - in terms of what should be the case - BUT in terms of how VAR was used to rule out Hendo’s goal v the BS it is offside.
I mean they can’t say Mané is off but Son is on. If Mané is off Son is more off surely...?
The thing with Manč's one is that they take the very last pixel of his sleeve's white end to determine his position. And that one is behind the defender's (looks like it at least). With Son his foot is the body part farthest forward so there's no such confusion.
Etiam si omnes, ego non
Bookmarks