![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Steveo
It was actually onside - in terms of what should be the case - BUT in terms of how VAR was used to rule out Hendo’s goal v the BS it is offside.
I mean they can’t say Mané is off but Son is on. If Mané is off Son is more off surely...?
![](https://i.ibb.co/rmWJ2qP/BB43-C150-BF10-4-F74-BD83-5-A1602554-B00.jpg)
Exactly Steveo.
Another poor decision by VAR for Son's goal. The VAR official froze the picture a frame too early. The ball was still in contact with the player's foot as it was on the halfway line, so why did VAR freeze it a foot before that? The answer is obvious. He wanted the goal to stand. By the next frame Son is a foot offside, not an armpit hair. That's why it looked offside in real time.
Something smells fishy about these decisions.
Offender Of The Offended...!!
It`s Better To Reign In Hell, Than Serve In Heaven!
Bookmarks