Originally Posted by
Steveo
It was actually onside - in terms of what should be the case - BUT in terms of how VAR was used to rule out Hendo’s goal v the BS it is offside.
I mean they can’t say Mané is off but Son is on. If Mané is off Son is more off surely...?
Exactly Steveo.
Another poor decision by VAR for Son's goal. The VAR official froze the picture a frame too early. The ball was still in contact with the player's foot as it was on the halfway line, so why did VAR freeze it a foot before that? The answer is obvious. He wanted the goal to stand. By the next frame Son is a foot offside, not an armpit hair. That's why it looked offside in real time.
Something smells fishy about these decisions.
Offender Of The Offended...!!
It`s Better To Reign In Hell, Than Serve In Heaven!
Bookmarks