But they haven't. In the chart you supply, the accuracy of which is hard to be certain of, there are different increases in value for different teams during that time frame.
For LFC it is an increase of 559 %
For Manchester United it is 220 %
For Chelsea it is 334 %
That proves my point. These increases in value do not reflect merely the inflation of the market as a whole because they differ. One difference is the way the clubs have been run and the type of investment they have received.
I notice you start blathering on again about how these changes are in fact due to the managerial changes but that is a different question. I was showing that there was a way to prove you were wrong when you said this;
The cash cow is buying a club at less than half price "a steal" for £300 million - making it run itself and then owning an asset worth nigh on £2 Billion. This is like real estate investment
If that were true, the clubs would increase their value in an even manner. But you have proved that they don't, which means you have proved yourself wrong.
You're all over the place again, Steveo. No wonder we get nowhere.
Bookmarks