Match Thread: Liverpool v Crystal Palace

[Nineteenx]

Booooooooom get the fucking FUCK in 1-1 Salaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah

Come thr fucking FUCK on Liverpool Nick yourselves a quick fire second goal here NOW!

[Crimson Dynasty]

Okay, ama do the Nineteen thing.

Let's go win this now!!!
Win it!!!!

[RedMagic]

Another Salah goal would be nice.

[teesred]

Come on. One more for Mo.

[justincredible]

In most cases, denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity results in a one-game ban, not a three-game ban. A three-game ban typically applies to violent conduct or serious foul play. The specific rules depend on the governing body and the competition, but generally, a red card for stopping a clear goal-scoring opportunity leads to a one-match suspension.

Is the correct answer. One game ban only for Grav...

[Crimson Dynasty]

Yeah but its considered gamesmanship in stopping a scoring opportunity. It wasnt serious foul play..

In most cases, denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity results in a one-game ban, not a three-game ban. A three-game ban typically applies to violent conduct or serious foul play. The specific rules depend on the governing body and the competition, but generally, a red card for stopping a clear goal-scoring opportunity leads to a one-match suspension.

I mean, you could be right.

Looking at the rules it seems clear that the three games suspension are usually violent conduct or serious foul play.
Denial of goal-scoring opportunity seems to fall under the "professional foul" category which earns one or 2 games.


Since most straight reds are usually issued for violent fouls or fouls deemed to endanger the health of the opposition player, I guess it leads to the assumption that any straight red (such as this was) would lead to the same length of suspension.

I guess it will all depend on the referee's report, but yeah it might be one game and not the 3.

[RedMagic]

What was that Mo?

[Nineteenx]

Come the FUCK on Liverpool last minute .com here NOW!

[Crimson Dynasty]

Jones has been absolutely atrocious in this game.

For the second time in as many sequences he lazily gives away the ball almost leading to a scoring opportunity and winner for Palace.

[justme]

I mean, you could be right.

Looking at the rules it seems clear that the three games suspension are usually violent conduct or serious foul play.
Denial of goal-scoring opportunity seems to fall under the "professional foul" category which earns one or 2 games.


Since most straight reds are usually issued for violent fouls or fouls deemed to endanger the health of the opposition player, I guess it leads to the assumption that any straight red (such as this was) would lead to the same length of suspension.

I guess it will all depend on the referee's report, but yeah it might be one game and not the 3.

Hope so, he will miss the dartboard game.. won't matter