It's pretty clear they don't practice penalty kicks during training, just based on how the misses were taken by the players who missed them.
Which isn't necessarily bad, but if you're going to have that attitude then don't let the games get to penalty kicks.
Otherwise, they need to get to practising penalty kicks and identifying good takers.
On the other side of the coin,.....what's that old saying again? Bad at saves during games but great at saving penalties and vice versa.
Allisson has never had a prolific penalty saving record like a Kelleher, so I guess the fact that he saved one today was something of a positive.
But it also underlines the point because he made a couple of saves during the game that not just kept us in the game but allowed the game to go to penalties.......when instead we should have taken those as opportunities to win the game outright in regulation time.
I've seen managers sbstituted out goalies when it becomes inevitably clear that a game is going to penalties and to bring in the understudy who's better at saving penalties.
I'm mixed about that sort of attitude as I'm not sure I'd want slot bringing in Mamardash for Allisson even if they determined in training he's better at penalties.
That's a terrible message to send to your starter - even though I appreciated the games in which we had Kelleher in goal when we had to go with penalties, because if nothing else it also gives the penalty takers more confidence knowing their goalie stood a better chance of nicking a save or two.
But in those games Kelleher was a starter and already in the game and wasn't being brought into the game late for the penalties.
All to say, I don't think Allisson should shoulder any of the blame for today as he gave us all the chances - including the save during the penalties - to win today.
The training staff and coaches have a lot of work on their hands before the season starts, beyond just the outfield issues in defence.
The team should practice penalties, which they very obviously currently don't do.