|
|
|
It's simple - see millers comment for the cutting brutal reality of the situation... if you want more:
Framing Luis Diaz's actions as pure greed rather than a pursuit of parity fundamentally misrepresents the financial context of his departure. The indisputable fact is that Diaz, a consistent starter and critical component of Liverpool's attack, was criminally underpaid relative to his direct peers in the squad. He was reportedly earning a base salary significantly lower than forwards like Diogo Jota and Darwin Núñez, despite often matching or exceeding their contributions. His demand was not for Mohamed Salah money, but for a contract that simply reflected his indispensable status in the starting 11. When Liverpool's management, citing his age or wage structure constraints, refused to offer this necessary raise and correct the disparity, the power lay entirely with the player to seek fair market value.
This was not a sentimental drama but a cold, hard business decision on his part. When Bayern Munich immediately offered him a deal reported to be three times his base Liverpool salary, securing the financial parity and recognition he was seeking, Diaz chose to accept. His exit was the logical consequence of a club refusing to adequately reward one of its star performers when his contract leverage was highest. To suggest he was a mercenary is to ignore that he was simply operating as a professional in a global marketplace, choosing the employer who was willing to meet his objectively reasonable valuation - a valuation Liverpool chose to ignore.
Diaz had never played in England when we signed him, and he got his move to Bayern rather than seeing out his time at LFC.
The club didn't let him go, he sought a move for bigger wages and got them at Bayern, ahead of his boyhood club Barca and his current club. I dont blame Diaz for taking the biggest offer on the table, but it does seem a few people have difficulty in accepting thats what he did. In the end we got a decent fee for him.
"Public anger flared after it was revealed that Díaz attended an influencer event in Colombia on July 6 — the same day as Jota’s funeral. Videos showing Díaz laughing, dancing, and posing at the event quickly circulated online, drawing widespread criticism.
Marca harshly criticized the winger, “While nearly all of Liverpool’s players mourned the death of a teammate, Díaz chose to attend a promotional event in Colombia as part of a sponsorship deal. Videos even showed him dancing. He should remember that Jota was one of the people who supported him the most when he joined Liverpool.” Facing growing backlash, Díaz deleted the videos but has not issued a formal apology or explanation."
Thats about the only bad thing I have to say about Diaz.
The first 2 goals, city didn't even have to work for them.
Konate misses a simple header. Just kisses it. That's a lack of concentration, that's a lack of urgency or worry about making a mistake.
The 2nd, Virgil stands there and let's it hit him. Again, lack of concentration or worrying about the consequences.
The work rate is gone. Why is anyone's guess, but slot isn't helping by letting the senior players away with these regular mistakes.