Match Thread Spurs V Liverpool

[Insidious]

If it is a broken leg, the recovery time can vary, massively.

If he just has a Fibula fracture then he would be out for anywhere between 6-10 weeks or so, if it's accompanied with a suitable surgery.

If he has Syndesmosis as well, then you're talking a 3-month minimum.

A Tibia fracture would be more serious - you're talking at least 3 months and maybe even right up to 5 months, which would (pretty much) end his season at the upper end of that timeframe.

[JockStrap]

Going into the game Spurs had won 2 drawn 2 and lost 4 games at home
17 home points in 13 months
They've give Wolves 1 off their 2 points this season at home as well.
Aye, no point expecting a win there, especially after about 10 minutes when it was obvious they had no confidence.
But you knock yourself out talking about gloryhunters.
Wanker.

Using that argument, City and Arsenal should expect to come to Anfield and win easy.

Glory hunter.

[CCTV]

1) Looks like a broken leg for Isak.
2)Having seen the replay of the challenge.. it was obviously a red card. but since Isak scored it didnt matter.. The amount of shit that happens to our players IE late challenges is ridiculous. but since we have corrupt Manchester fucking cunts of refs they seem to take delight in not protecting us
Sorry for swearing, I don't normally swear. but i have so much dislike for our officials it makes me explode at times

1) looks like a broken leg. An X-ray might provide certainty.....

2) spot on.

It's funny how spurs home record was so prominently featured before kick-off. Certainly fired up and deserved 3 red cards minimum.

[ianlfc]

Using that argument, City and Arsenal should expect to come to Anfield and win easy.

Glory hunter.

What argument?

[JockStrap]

What argument?

How stupid is he?

[Steveo]

Jokestrap - who exactly are you talking to?

[JockStrap]

Jokestrap - who exactly are you talking to?

The person I quoted. That's how a forum normally works.

It was a rhetorical question. I don't need nor want your input.

[Steveo]

If you’re quoting Ian but referring to him as 'he,' you’ve stopped talking to him and started talking about him to the rest of us. That’s not 'how a forum works,' that’s you looking for an audience to agree with you. If you don't want my input, stop addressin' the whole room like a secondary school gossip.

[JockStrap]

Victor doesn't understand what a rhetorical question is. Ask whatever AI you've been using to craft some of your posts. It will explain.

[Steveo]

Ai.. as if any were needed ..You do flatter yourself don't you. There is nothing even remotely "rhetorical" in your direct question - look up its meaning dumbkopf - it was done as usual to address the forum...


Happy Trollmas