View Poll Results: Which owners are best for LFC?

Voters
4. You may not vote on this poll
  • FSG - US

    3 75.00%
  • Arsenal - Stan Kroenke - US

    0 0%
  • Aston Villa - V Sports - Egypt/US

    0 0%
  • Bournemouth - William P. Foley - US

    0 0%
  • Brentford - Matthew Benham (Gambling firms) - Eng

    0 0%
  • Brighton - Tony Bloom (Gambling firms) - Eng

    0 0%
  • Chelsea - Todd Boehly - US

    0 0%
  • Crystal Palace - Woody Johnson (Consortium) - US

    0 0%
  • Everton - The Friedkin Group - US

    1 25.00%
  • Fulham - Shahid Khan - Pakistan/US

    0 0%
  • Leeds United - 49ers Enterprises - US

    0 0%
  • Man City - Abu Dhabi United Group - UAE

    0 0%
  • Man Utd - Glaxers - US

    0 0%
  • Newcastle - Public Investment Fund - Saudi

    0 0%
  • Forest - Evangelos Marinakis - Greece

    0 0%
  • Sunderland - Kyril Louis-Dreyfus - France/Switz

    0 0%
  • Spurs - Joe Lewis (Currency Trading) - Eng

    0 0%
  • West Ham - David Sullivan (Porn) - Eng

    0 0%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Pick your owners

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    4,754

    Pick your owners

    Given the constant talk of FSG not being good enough let's have a discussion on alternatives. You get to choose any other owners in the Premier League to replace them. Who are you picking and why?

    18 options seems to be the maximum in a poll so I've dropped Burnley and Wolves. If any of you want their owners it's

    Burlney - Alan Pace - US
    Wolves - Fosun International - Chiina

    Where multiple owners are listed for a club I've picked the owner with the highest share holding.
    Last edited by JockStrap; 11th February 2026 at 02:16 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    28,666
    Not just about them though

    Pick your transfer & scouting team

    Pick your youth setup & prospects

    Much much more to everything, but all comes from the top.

    Pick your set piece coach.. (lol)

    if the club was run well lately, we wouldn't have gone from 1st to 6th with issues that are obvious.
    Last edited by Kev0909; 11th February 2026 at 02:13 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    4,754
    Come on Kev, press that FSG option. You know you want to

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    4,754
    Don't be shy people. All of you calling for F$G Out now have a chance to tell us who you would prefer.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    4,754
    More whining about the owners in another thread but no credible alternative put forward.

    It's right to assume that FSG are indeed the best owners we could have at this time.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    29,640
    Klopps vision of how a football club should be run, matches up well with FSGs.

    https://tomkinstimes.com/2015/11/klopp-reversing-the-laws-of-gravity/

    I think they are reasonably good owners.

    Since taking over they've nearly won 5 or 6 PL titles. Won 1 under Klopp. Won1 under Slot.

    (All title lost to 115 Citaue protected by Islamophiles)

    Could have won 1 under Rodgers.
    Could have won 3 more under Klopp 18/19, 21/22 & 23/24.

    Who knows what benefit that might have brought to Klopp in Europe.

    Klopp won 1 CL title.
    Probably too much of a gap between the squads, when Ramos concussed Karius and took out Salahs shoulder.
    But in 21/22 the sides were more evenly balanced.

    If we accept Cituae 115 are the lance Armstrong of football, it is arguably the case that Klopps 18/19 to 19/20 are the best team in PL era.

    That aside, the club has had decent success under their tutelage, and the capacity at Anfield has surpassed 60k. Facilities improved and annual revenue up significantly.

    You can put it all down to Klopp, but Klopp chose LFC under FSGs tutelage as their vision of football aligns with his own.

    If UK fans ever want the German model of fan football, then those fans who fork up the capital to buy a 50% share of the club, do not want to be forking out 100s of pounds a year on transfers and spending.

    Similarly, if fans want to control ticket prices, they cannot want massive spending.
    As although I've argued matchday tickets should be decoupled from wider inflation in football like tv revenue inflation, ticket prices increasing will always need to linked to some of the massive spends in PL football.

    Overall decent owners, with a good structure in place for the clubs finances.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    29,640
    I'll pick FSG,
    though I have presented a means of assessing football spending and have been impressed with Villa under Emery & Brighton for example.

    Albeit I've no idea if these are yank or Chinese or Saudi owners etc.

    I see Brighton are English owned - I like that

    And I see Villa are Egypt/US owned.

    It's a pity the poll ain't public. I voted FSG, guess Jocky did too, and I wonder did Kev0 pick Everton
    Last edited by CCTV; 16th February 2026 at 03:59 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    4,754
    I did check the option to make it public but it didn't work for some reason.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    4,754
    Quote Originally Posted by CCTV View Post
    If we accept Cituae 115 are the lance Armstrong of football, it is arguably the case that Klopps 18/19 to 19/20 are the best team in PL era.
    Yea. It always felt that ill-informed fans were looking at the wrong people to apportion blame. Constant moaning about FSG not supporting Klopp enough. The reality is the only thing that stopped Klopp from winning more titles was City cheating.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    29,640
    Quote Originally Posted by JockStrap View Post
    Yea. It always felt that ill-informed fans were looking at the wrong people to apportion blame. Constant moaning about FSG not supporting Klopp enough. The reality is the only thing that stopped Klopp from winning more titles was City cheating.

    Can't underestimate the G.Nev take on spending influence. Braindead.

    Emery Villa 22/23 to 23/34
    €125.09 mill net spent & 151 cent gained per euro.

    Rodgers 12/13 to Post-Summer of 15/16
    €173.86 mill net spent & 2.4 cent gained per euro.

    Thats some analysis I provided. Those were the extreme ends, including others.

    To put it in a simple context, to add €100 million net in players from net spending, you'd need to give:

    Emery €66.2 Million
    &
    Rodgers €4.167 Billion

    *based on the data above

    From Transfermarkt & CCTV

    https://forums.lfconline.co.uk/showthread.php?311530-Transfer-spening-and-footy-finances&p=2886386#post2886386

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •