The Shill Effect

[miller0863]

He appears to be upset with me, not for anything I said but because I apparently didn’t defend his honour when Kev had a go at him.

The fact I didn’t see said interaction appears to be completely irrelevant

[Steveo]

You should take it as a kind of validation miller. He seems unhinged or is trying to appear so.

On another note - I suggest the security camera is immune from any “ban” which could - point us all in the right direction - perhaps the driving force behind the fake personas…?

Yes - a conspiracy theory - but IF you read the WhiteChildrenMatter thread - you will know what I mean

[CCTV]

I still don’t understand exactly what it is you are intimating?
I had several words with Kev about him going too far, against various other Forum members.
If I didn’t say anything about the particular incident re you, it is because I didn’t see it, I don’t live on here.

You took offense when I posted what I did to Kev0.
I pointed out to you what Kev0 said to me which was as I recall the very post before mine. You did not comment.
To give you the benefit of the doubt, I'd have to assume you were on the thread, posted your upset about my reply to Kev0 directly above my post, and assume you never saw Kev0s post, or my reply to you.
Not the 1st time you've shown selectivity on here, so no benefit of the doubt from me. You like to clutch at principles selectively.

[miller0863]

Ok whatever. I have no interest in a 15 page back and forth

[ianlfc]

Ok whatever. I have no interest in a 15 year back and forth

Fixed that for you 🤣

[justincredible]

Such a shame miller... t'wud have been good craic!

[CCTV]

He appears to be upset with me, not for anything I said but because I apparently didn’t defend his honour when Kev had a go at him.

The fact I didn’t see said interaction appears to be completely irrelevant

You took offense when I posted what I did to Kev0.
I pointed out to you what Kev0 said to me which was as I recall the very post before mine. You did not comment.
To give you the benefit of the doubt, I'd have to assume you were on the thread, posted your upset about my reply to Kev0 directly above my post, and assume you never saw Kev0s post, or my reply to you.
Not the 1st time you've shown selectivity on here, so no benefit of the doubt from me. You like to clutch at principles selectively.

Ok whatever. I have no interest in a 15 page back and forth