Reply With QuoteId have him back but slot didnt use him much and was replaced by wirtz.Originally Posted by shminkyred
Fought for the shirt more than a lot of them,being a true red isnt enough these days.
|
|
|
First Team
I just saw a report that Villa dont want him permanently and a few more games will trigger a clause where they are forced to buy.
Looks like the only option is that he comes back. He will have a point to prove and I never wanted him to go in the first place...
Thoughts? I can't imagine he would make us worse than we are at the moment?
Harvey Elliott: Aston Villa seeking solution for on-loan Liverpool player - BBC Sport
https://share.google/jTfZdbIGnPzc6gUXN
Last edited by shminkyred; Today at 10:09 AM.
First Team
Id have him back but slot didnt use him much and was replaced by wirtz.
Fought for the shirt more than a lot of them,being a true red isnt enough these days.
First Team
Those sorts of deals are shite and we should have never agreed to it.
Loan with option to buy or loan with mandatory purchase.
This sort of deal just stifles the players progress if the buying club is no longer interested or can’t afford to pay the fee
First Team
His height will be a great attribute for defending set pieces.
Jokes aside, there's 3 positions he could cover to varying levels in a 4-2-3-1 depending on opposition and a couple of positions in a 4-4-2 Diamond so if he did come back it might take some last-20-minutes pressure off Wirtz/Jones/Szob/Mac Allister here or there.
I do feel that a permanent move away is best for him long-term but he still has time on his side.
Reserve
He can't get in the Villa team. I think his level is bottom half of the division. I think we should be looking at players with pace and power. He doesn't fit that bill
First Team
No thanks, not good enough never will be
the fact villa doesn't want him says it all
Posting Permissions