For me it's not so much the fact that we're currently struggling (....or what the various causes are. And we know there are many).
It's more of how he's responding to them and adapting to the situation that's leaving me with questions about him.
I had the same feeling of beffudlement today with his substitution decisions as I had with his starting lineup pick against Galatasary.
And I get that some of it has been forced into his hand by the club's failure to get some players in certain positions where we badly needed them..
But in the moment when you need a change, and you need to put some spark in the team that's been sleepwalking through half after you conceded an early goal, and you decide to bring on a defensive midfield late rather than one of a couple of attackers to try to win the game after Chelsea had just taken off yet another player to injury.
Or when you make the lineup and formation change that forces you to play your influential midfielders in the backline and thus reduce our effectiveness in the middle of the park.
All while leaving on the field players who've been utterly ineffective and invisible (regardless of their status) for the full 90....
....all just leaves me questioning what's going on with the management decision-making.
Today we saw Maresca take a risk - even when everyone could have excused them for tryin to play it safe and instead losing this game with all the injuries they're facing and players they're missing - and he got rewarded for it.
Slot instead was the one who decided to play it safe late and not take a risk, and we got punished for it.
They say a manager's real mettle gets tested when the team gets in a losing rut in what he does to get them out of that rut.
I guess we're at that point now and so far he's not filling me with a great deal of confidence that he's going to figure this out.
It's more of how he's responding to them and adapting to the situation that's leaving me with questions about him.
I had the same feeling of beffudlement today with his substitution decisions as I had with his starting lineup pick against Galatasary.
And I get that some of it has been forced into his hand by the club's failure to get some players in certain positions where we badly needed them..
But in the moment when you need a change, and you need to put some spark in the team that's been sleepwalking through half after you conceded an early goal, and you decide to bring on a defensive midfield late rather than one of a couple of attackers to try to win the game after Chelsea had just taken off yet another player to injury.
Or when you make the lineup and formation change that forces you to play your influential midfielders in the backline and thus reduce our effectiveness in the middle of the park.
All while leaving on the field players who've been utterly ineffective and invisible (regardless of their status) for the full 90....
....all just leaves me questioning what's going on with the management decision-making.
Today we saw Maresca take a risk - even when everyone could have excused them for tryin to play it safe and instead losing this game with all the injuries they're facing and players they're missing - and he got rewarded for it.
Slot instead was the one who decided to play it safe late and not take a risk, and we got punished for it.
They say a manager's real mettle gets tested when the team gets in a losing rut in what he does to get them out of that rut.
I guess we're at that point now and so far he's not filling me with a great deal of confidence that he's going to figure this out.

Comment