Tweet
all I've got to say is
Loooooool
Loooooool
-
-
Woakes showing the rest how to bat...Comment
-
Disaster for England, hopefully Archer's fit to come in for Jimmy. Really need to find a spinner who can relied on, Ali has shown time and time again he blows hot and cold far too often and more cold than hot and he should be thoroughly embarrassed at the vast disparity between Lyon's figures and his own with the pitch in similar conditions.
Everyone's lauding Australia today, but in truth it was made easy for them, England were their top strike bowler down which contributed to Australia's huge second innings total together and mostly with Ali's complete ineptitude. Credit to Australia, but, when you have a target that's practically unasailable and are able to play with so many fielders around the bat for every delivery it's going to be a hell of a lot easier to get wickets, could Lyon deliver what he did today with a total that was easily in reach? Absolutely not, completely different game, the openers can go after him, scoring heavily and quickly and he can't have 6 fielders around the bat, same goes for Australia's seamers today, they can't just constantly bang in short balls without 6 fielders around the bat and now Broad's pace has dropped 5 or 6 and with Archer unavailable England didn't have an option to bang in those short balls with fielders around the bat looking for anything nicked with the variable bounce. Having Lyon's rotating with a seamer also kept the ball fresher and doing something for longer"If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”Comment
-
I must say, I know nothing about cricket, but this thread is entertaining as hell.Etiam si omnes, ego nonComment
-
couldn't find the "sarcasm" emoji, then?Originally posted by Balinkay View PostThere's too much confusion, I can't get no reliefComment
-
No sarcasm here - it's genuinely fun to hear comments like "England have bottled it again", which can so easily be applied to footie.Originally posted by redebreck View PostEtiam si omnes, ego nonComment
-
glad you're enjoying it - England cricket supporters don't!Originally posted by Balinkay View PostThere's too much confusion, I can't get no reliefComment
-
Lol wasn't a case of bottling it, main strike bowler injured and only bowled 4 overs, Ali didn't bottle it, he's always blown hot and cold and his performance against the Aussies in their second innings was woeful, England need to find a spinner who can be relied on to always be at least a 7 out of 10, if any of the seamers or fast bowlers were as inconsistent as Ali, they wouldn't be in the team.Originally posted by Balinkay View Post
There's also a hell of a lot of luck involved in cricket, Australia massively benefitted from the ball going 'dead' for 30-40 overs of their first and second innings, it's where and why they amassed most of their runs, when the ball reached that stage in England's first innings, it went a bit out of shape, so the Aussies managed to get it changed by the umpire. When this happens the umpire brings a box of old balls that have been used for the same number of overs in other tests for them to pick one, I actually think the rule should be changed on this and it should be the umpire who selects the ball, IE, selecting a ball that is in the same or similar condition but not mishapen. As the ball the Aussies selected looked a lot newer and in better condition than the others and it behaved like a new ball and got them crucial wickets at a time England would have been piling the runs on with little risk of getting out otherwise, which would have made it a VERY different game.
The thing with the box of balls that have been used for the same amount of overs in previous tests is really stupid imo, as the condition of the ball depends on the conditions it has been used in and how it has been used, so just having a ball of balls previously used in a test for the same number of overs is massively inconsistent. For example, had rain come today and rained play off, with today's ball having been used for say 40 overs, and that ball had gone into a box, it would have been in very good condition, because Australia were consistently bowling spin with it at one end, and because of the circumstances they could have 6 men around the bat, making scoring more difficult, so wouldn't have been bashed about a lot by the bat either"If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”Comment
-
Have to say I thoroughly enjoyed watching Lyon rip through England. Its a big bonus for the Australian batsmen to not have to face Anderson for the next couple of tests tooComment
-
England folded like a pack of cards in the end.....Have to agree with Michael Vaughan's post match assessment on Channel 5...'I fear for this England team this summer'...'The Aussies look to have the better bowlers AND Steve Smith'....
Comment
-
Don't agree they have the better bowlers, they've got a more consistent spinner, they just benefitted from having the ball changed in England's first innings and despite having been previously used for the same number of overs in a test, the ball they picked was in far better condition than the one replaced and behaved like a new ball and that changed the game as England would have piled on A LOT more runs in that period otherwise, it was that period when the ball 'went dead' after 35-40 overs in which Australia got the vast majority of their runs in both innings. The ball change was the biggest game changer for Australia in that first test, had that not happened, England pile on 450 plus, Aussies under the cosh second innings, England can have 5 or 6 around the bat on every delivery, completely different gameOriginally posted by Martyboy View PostEngland folded like a pack of cards in the end.....Have to agree with Michael Vaughan's post match assessment on Channel 5...'I fear for this England team this summer'...'The Aussies look to have the better bowlers AND Steve Smith'....
Not hard bowling a team out when you have an lead you know is unassailable and can put 5 or 6 men around the bat for every delivery, it wasn't the bowlers that were the difference, that was the situation, if any test team found themselves in a position like that and could have 5 or 6 men around the bat for every delivery their bowlers would have a field day"If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”Comment
-
WHY DOES ROY KEEP STARTING!!!!!!!
out for 0 this time, normally lasts at least 10 minsComment
-
oh dear, took me back to Roy Hodgson's spell here at AnfieldOriginally posted by Kev0909 View PostThere's too much confusion, I can't get no reliefComment
-
-
Lol Aussies enjoying the British weather in the second test, think the Aussies are going to win the series, lady luck isn't just smiling on them throughout so far, she's giving them a golden shower"If Everton were playing at the bottom of my garden, i'd close the curtains”Comment
Comment