Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Define woke

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally coined to highlight social injustice in the US, particularly black people.
    Now hijacked by racist bigots like those who complain about booing the national anthem but are equally outraged at players taking the knee or gay people being allowed marraige.
    The Tories are peddling it so its lapped up by the right wing press in the UK.
    The defining moments in our lives are never planned.

    Comment


    • #17
      It's what I do at 5am every weekday morning. Yeah, White privilege n all that!
      Offender Of The Offended...!!

      It`s Better To Reign In Hell, Than Serve In Heaven!

      Comment


      • #18


        Woke is putting BLM on #Nike Kit of LFC for 2 years,
        Whereas a dude who flies WLM over a stadium is interviewed by Police, loses his job to mass reaction pressures, whilst his partner was forced to attend reeeeeducation training by her employer or lose her job over his actions.
        It's that fusion of state and corporate.

        It's likely losing your job in media for pointing out blacks were over represented in the men's side last summer, cause ya #racist.
        And increasing your career chances for saying there are too many white women in the women's side this summer. Cause you sjw

        It's looking up at men being the very top earners, and claiming discrimination. But never looking at who dominates the lower paid jobs, men. It's refusing to understand the distribution curves of intelligence, men have wider distributions of intelligence than women. This means you would excpet men to be overrepresented at both ends.

        It's a police force exposed as having covered up a likely 100,000+ minor sex victims, gang raped, because the Police didn't want to be seen as racist.....
        Because of the homogeneity of the diverse group doing the gang rapes.
        But then these police, police social media posts that are problematic.. to check your thinking, as the are clearly social justice thought experts...
        Empowered by new age blasphemy laws from the very party that covered up these rapes in the main

        It's knowing which tragedies are good for the corporate and sponsors desires.
        It's knowing standing up for grooming gang victims just isn't worth it.
        It's knowing that condemning a player for kicking a cat has more social media capital than standing up for an 11 year old gang rape victim.
        It's knowing your stop Asian hate should be silent on whose doing the Asian hate. Wokeists posit that Asians success in the west is because the are allied to white supremacy.

        It's publishing demographic data and discussing dispossesing the native/right of a chance of holding power via a pro-immigration policy, how bames can see the gammon dispossessed of office forever.
        Whilst declaring anti-immigration discussion as racist. Replacement theory a conspiracy theory.

        It's publishing sections of main kampf in your academic journals, where jew/jewry is replaced with white and German with black, and not realising you've been trolled.

        It's screaming about increased inequality, but failing to see how immigration of more and less successful groups than the natives naturally increases inequality within a society.

        It's screaming diversity is our strength, without any indication of the downsides.
        It's screaming about how racist your countries are then wondering why people in Africa think Klopp is a racist.

        It's being thoroughly unfair, whilst believing yourself the fairest of them all.

        It's creating a social capital around lgbtq issues to the point where your kids will ideally be trans to please their parent/s. To provide the known social capital and validate their parents desires

        It's calling gays who won't have sex with 'the same sex as them but other genitals' far right homomsexuals. So you can bash a gay man as far right, because he won't have sex with a man with a vagina.
        It's running hate campaigns against lesbians who felt they were forced to have sex with women with chest hair and a penis, by others in the community.
        It's calling people bigots for denying their dad gave birth to them, or denying that they were a woman when they inserted semen into your mum.
        It's telling people men can have periods and get pregnant, because women who say they are men have a baby in their womb. Again bigot if you disagree

        It's giving a month to pride, and a day to mothers and fathers. It's recording a bumming which culminates in the baptismal font, because they are softer than the Muslims.
        Maybe a victims of state sanctioned rape day might be required.

        It's claiming trans people are more oppressed than blacks in the slave trade or Jews in concentration camps because their suicide rate are higher.

        It's being very think skinned, so you can refuse discussion and play victim.
        But being strong enough to dish it out, and be relentless.

        It's supporting abortion as part of your social justice work, when abortion is a eugenics tool.
        Getting rid of working class babies, in the USA a lot of black babies.
        It's calling men who mass exterminate disableds out of existence, monsters.
        Then calling women who eradicate babies with downs syndrome, stunning and brave.

        You can go from condemning Hitler/Stalin whoever, for eradicating these people, to rationalising its for the persons best interests when mothers do it.

        If an 11 year boy dances in a gay/trans club for men dressed as a girl, it's stunning and brave. If it's a cis girl dancing for men, it's different, because trans girls are really girls.

        It's discussing the issues around consent in our modern age, like everyone is in a long married relationship.
        It's pretending the society doesn't have an extremely different tone around sex.
        It's saying porn is toxic masculinity. But you want your kids to be at a pride gay bdsm, even after they asked for no kids. It's saying you want porn for kids.

        It's petitioning dictionaries to change definitions to win arguments.

        It's disingenuous, hypocrisy, believing you are better than others not on the virtue of your deeds or actions, but because of your views. It's believing you would do more were you richer and had power.
        It is a lazy narcissists wetdream.

        Comment


        • #19
          Oh and you can become the...

          Blackface of white supremacy
          Far right gays
          Not the right type of diveristy etc

          Where you don't vote left for social justice parties.

          Comment


          • #20
            I think it's too broad to define and actually a bit meaningless. Just look at some of the posts on here. Some very subjective definitions.
            "...and my inch is like a freight train, so I only use it in self defence"

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by vin View Post
              I think it's too broad to define and actually a bit meaningless. Just look at some of the posts on here. Some very subjective definitions.
              Once upon a time gay men called for tolerance to their desire to have sex with biological men.

              Today such a view, is far right homosexuality.

              Gaymen today are expected in the name of social justice to have sex with men who have breats and vaginas.

              Just because an ideology is highly subjective, radically changes its position, doesn't mean its hard to define.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by CCTV View Post
                Once upon a time gay men called for tolerance to their desire to have sex with biological men.

                Today such a view, is far right homosexuality.

                Gaymen today are expected in the name of social justice to have sex with men who have breats and vaginas.

                Just because an ideology is highly subjective, radically changes its position, doesn't mean its hard to define.
                Gaymen today are expected in the name of social justice to have sex with men who have breats and vaginas.

                Really?

                And that's woke?
                "...and my inch is like a freight train, so I only use it in self defence"

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by vin View Post
                  Gaymen today are expected in the name of social justice to have sex with men who have breats and vaginas.

                  Really?

                  And that's woke?
                  Of course.
                  It would be transphobic for a gayman to refuse to have sex with a man with a vagina, just because he had a vagina.
                  You are literally killing people with your identiny denying hate. It's transphobic !
                  Gaymen have become very problematic. Many are transphobic and they got a pass on a lot of misogyny when they were the favourites.

                  It's also been documented how and why, men who raped women with their own penis, were permitted to identify as women and live in female only prisons after being sentenced for rape, with rape occurring with her penis whilst in prison against women.

                  You see typically already cis-women enjoy a life of cis-heteronormal privilige, trans are so much more oppressed in our societies.
                  Whereas men who might have been born with cis-male-privilige (lots of privilege compared with women), who later tell you they are women are now the most oppressed women. Because they are trans women, and no different than cis women.
                  Transmen grade up from woman to man, but still loses out mostly through the Trans.

                  So when a cis-gay refuses a trans gay as a sex partner, its transphobia. Check your privilege
                  When a woman refuses a transwoman from being a woman, its transphobia.
                  If you're a dude flashing your cock in the nude at a women and girls only nude spa, asking chicks without dicks if they're lesbians, and a black cis-scum mother complains on her and her child's behalf.
                  They're the problem. They're the bigots.
                  They're demanding the actual law be broken.
                  You have your right as a woman to flash your penis in nude women only areas.

                  I'm better than you,
                  Mr Woke.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    https://www.instagram.com/reel/CgvWrtHDO0U/

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by teesred View Post
                      Originally coined to highlight social injustice in the US, particularly black people.
                      Now hijacked by racist bigots like those who complain about booing the national anthem but are equally outraged at players taking the knee or gay people being allowed marraige.
                      The Tories are peddling it so its lapped up by the right wing press in the UK.
                      Chris Rock stopped playing University gigs a good while back because of woke people.
                      It wasn't worth the hassle of reading the rules around what he could joke about.
                      Because it had to be social justice approved art. Because that's what comedy is.....

                      Dave Chapelle had another theatre cancel a gig on him in this past week, because the woke go after him a lot.
                      Ricky Gervais is another who they hate. Along with JK Rowling.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Pretty funny 4 to have been targeted by Woke people in the name of social justice and equality.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I believe each are left wing personas

                          Comment


                          • #29
                            So does anyone want to state, whether or not, you support the rights of rapists with a penis to live as women in female only prisons?

                            Comment


                            • #30
                              woke

                              Heterosexual white males (and females) are (possibly, at the moment) representative of the majority of the population of the UK. NUMERICALLY.
                              However, this "group" have the least right to have their opinions, and voice their opinions.

                              For me, this is typically "woke"
                              There's too much confusion, I can't get no relief

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X