CC - let me try this way....
What happened at Dortmund...?
|
|
At Dortmund Klopp had lower net spend and success
At lfc prior to Klopp we had higher net spend than Klopp at Dortmund & Klopp at Liverpool
Klopp brought a massive impact to the club, getting to know the tea ladies, brought title successes, top4s, transformed player sales & acquisitions, wanted to build organically.
But the reduction in net spend when Klopp arrived was due to the savvy and greedy investors.
The savvy and greedy investors decided to reduce investment as measured by Net Spend, handicapping Klopp the best manager they have landed and their investment.
Some might think that's a strange decision even from a purely greed and self interest perspective....
Everything else Klopp, net spend coincidence.
CC - let me try this way....
What happened at Dortmund...?
So far no reply as to how this transpired.
Was klopp promised the same net spend as before he arrived, only for FSG to break that pledge.
Did they hoodwink him on the financials and use his desperation to join lfc and end his sabbatical with only half the net spend available.
Why did fsg decide to risk growth for their investment by reducing net spend once they had the best manager to date under their tenure.
It seems hard to paint a credible picture of the events, no answers might be the wise option. Plead the 5th
I don’t know what nonsensical question you are asking. English clearly isn’t your first language.
His low net spend at Dortmund resulted in what? 2 big seasons of success and then what happened?
If you were FSG - would you want to copy that template?
You are saying Klopp got every player he wanted and had every penny he needed.
Pure unfiltered hogwash...
He is happy to work within restraints - that is not the same as - Klopp can only work within restraints. So here’s what we do.. the minute he achieves success - we make a profit in the transfer market
Stop being an FSG shill - too many already on here FFS!
Last edited by Steveo; 14th February 2021 at 09:23 PM.
They lost key players for free to Bayern. Lewandowski and Gotze, Lewandowski being an incredible loss.
Klopp had injuries in his squad particularly Reus and the life cycle of a coach had run its course.
7years in the modern game being a good stint.
Maybe try answering questions, that's another way to have a discussion.
There are also too many who are willing to stick the boot into the owners as soon as they get an opportunity to. All i'm interested in is a successful team on the pitch, how much it costs or has cost is pretty irrelevant to the fans because no-one on here knows what goes on inside the club. Speculate all you want, but it make your theories correct.
If you're not sure what to do with the ball, just put it in the net, and we'll talk about the other options later... Bob Paisley.
Bayern as usual took his feet out from under him, he lost Lewandowski on a free transfer and Bayern won every league title since.
We've not lost any key players on a free transfer. So we've not copied that critical detail. As said klopp has learned from his Dortmund experience. Meticulous in getting a profile of players outside of their football ability.
He's clearly chosen to work with clubs who have constraints and could have joined a top dog at any point really. He's a perfect fit for any club. Top, middling or bottom.
The fact he's chosen the tougher path, shouldn't lead you to make conclusions of your own about my views.
We've secured players to contracts and made sure we got to dollar for the one who jumped ship.
Stop being a coward and answers questions my man, it doesn't help your case to state something and plead the 5th.
Fsg shill, if you say so, please explain why these greedy and savvy investors decided to reduce net spend when Klopp arrived.
Risking the growth of their own investment.
In a greedy, self interest case it doesn't make sense that this just arrived when Klopp did.
But I'm awaiting your actual answer so as I don't have to guess or deal with alternative scenarios.
What is it
Not enough criticism of them IMO. There would be 5 times more were it not for Hicks & Gillett and the media circus the banks created around our golden giveaway.
The owners are not above criticism
and Klopp gets miles more.
They were utterly pathetic in summer 2019... and one assumes Klopp only gets Jota and Thiago by letting Lovren, Clyne and Lallana go.
You are a shill and clearly not one of the brightest either.
Ooh it’s “my man” now is it. Didn’t take long for the old Irish temper to rear its ugly head
Any reduction in investment is purely the result of the upward trajectory of Klopp’s tenure. As mentioned earlier on this very thread. His impact was almost immediate.
FSG = ah you can have a Euro run and get to top 4 without any negative spend. That’s the ticket.
But did that really need answering...?
Are you really so obtuse?
Watch this.. always makes me laugh.
Last edited by Steveo; 14th February 2021 at 09:45 PM.
Bookmarks