General Transfer Thread Summer 2023

[JockStrap]

Not my figures bimbo. Recognised net spends of the relative clubs across the last 10 years.

Now... after 456 posts - starting from January 2023 - and not 1 of them of any use.... Either write in English OR do us all a favour.. take your tedious, daft Scot/glish accent and fuck off.

They're th' figures 'n' timelines ye chose tae moan aboot. Ye stairted wi' 2019-2023 then changed whin they figures didnae suit. Th' problem fur ye is that no set o' figures wull back up yer childish critisim o' F$G (you shuid be embarrassed by that).

I know ye'r upset bairn. Ah shawed yer argument wis nonsensical. That's yer problem.

I'll write whitevur wey ah choose.

[faridtoxteth]

Not my figures bimbo. Recognised net spends of the relative clubs across the last 10 years.

Now... after 456 posts - starting from January 2023 - and not 1 of them of any use.... Either write in English OR do us all a favour.. take your tedious, daft Scot/glish accent and fuck off.

Please don't come on here and call people bimbo and tell them to fuck off. You're very quick to insult posters who you've never met and know nothing about.
Either argue your point with some dignity or ignore the posters who seem to be able to put a hair up your ass.

[Insidious]

9th in the last 5 years across the net spend league 2019..2020..2021..2022..2023….and bottom (6th out of 6) in the last 10 years in the big six net spend league.

Agenda would seem to be rock solid and uber consistent & time periods overlap.

Next..

Just a couple of points on net spend - and I want to be clear here, I am not advocating "cheaping out" at every possible opportunity as there are definitely times to spend etc - that said, the net spend chart -

- Doesn't factor in wages.
- Doesn't factor incentivised contracts.
- A club that sells well may not look "good" on a net spend table if you measure good spending as big spending.
- Doesn't factor in the poor spending choices of the big spenders who have had to keep buying in certain areas (Pep with full-backs for example) due to not nailing their recruitment.

Whilst we have definitely spent conservatively at times, we have also afforded the ability not to have to spend as big or as often partly because we (mostly) recruit incredibly well.

[CCTV]

Melwood was an opportunistic shite show mate.. and most who are aware of the details will say the same. Sold to developers - 'to flatten the site and build 160 high-end family homes'. Ultimately - only after multiple appeals and demonstrations AND second raft of developers - Torus - couldn't get what they wanted that the women now have. Don't see what is to defend F$G with here apart from a huge amount of spin.

Even in this watered down version of events it is clear to see what really motivates them to act and then - when faced with determined opposition - as with Season Ticket price hikes and Trademarking names - back track.

https://www.thisisanfield.com/2019/08/fsgs-thankless-task-amid-melwood-sale-and-liverpool-trademark-disputes/

But enough on the weak work on the infrastructure and move to a training ground few players enjoy.

On to Jurgen and his "backing"..

Yours seems to be the "logic" Joetan highlighted to perfection and WHY it got under the noses of a few.

The better Klopp does with less...the more is asked of him. If he doesn't perform a miracle - or comes within a whisker it is his fault OR the officials cheating us.

I honestly believe for some of you - if he was managing to stay away from the jab in a boxing match spinning plates with his left with the right tied behind his back - you and your ilk would say - see - he is doing just fine... Doesn't need anymore to compete.. Then in round 5 when he gets caught - you'd say.. That's on him. Didn't block the jab..

Instead of being real and accepting the very reasonable (one that most neutral fans accept) view that with better backing - missing out on titles by a single point x2 need not have come to pass. Nor - perhaps would we have needed the last day of the title defence season to make it into the CL and save us from spending 2 out of the last 3 seasons outside in the cold..


Your last line..

'In the here and present, Klopp looks rejuvenated and we are beating city away tomorrow to go top of the league.'

I can dig that.. Klopp looks invigorated and the result tomorrow - that is something we all are hoping for.

Oh no, fsg are motivated by money.. so too the fans and players.

Last summer our club ballsed up the transfer window, and thereafter Klopp ballsed up the season changing at the very end of it was nearly enough. Season before came down to 2 pivotal games we failed to win.

As said Klopps great but no without complaint.

The injury crisis season, just unfortunate. City also had a blip season. Up until last season, city and ourselves have had equivalent points over numerous seasons. The highest around Europe.

I've opened a thread about our title race and squad comparison with city. I'm bullish based on the players available to both managers. I can understand some others might prefer city's squad over ours.

Klopps up against Pep, you must surely be expecting a LFC title this year, now at least ?

[Steveo]

Please don't come on here and call people bimbo and tell them to fuck off. You're very quick to insult posters who you've never met and know nothing about.
Either argue your point with some dignity or ignore the posters who seem to be able to put a hair up your ass.

Crap as is usual from you. What a snowflake.."Bimbo" enough get you in a spin. Must be a walk in the palk in Toxteth since I last spent time there..

For a start I have not been quick to insult anyone. I have tried to remain cordial - many others have told Knob-Jockey far worse and far sooner..yet strangely you choose my comment to pick out - Why...?

Cause you know what I think of you.. Farid

For the record. I told someone who refuses to see what is put CLEARLY before him/her/it - again and again - to at least write in English or do one. Someone who cannot accept the facts… when presented with them again and again… and who then continues to go to lengths to write his Shyte in a difficult to read unintelligible way,

Take a hike

[Steveo]

Oh no, fsg are motivated by money.. so too the fans and players.

Last summer our club ballsed up the transfer window, and thereafter Klopp ballsed up the season changing at the very end of it was nearly enough. Season before came down to 2 pivotal games we failed to win.

As said Klopps great but no without complaint.

The injury crisis season, just unfortunate. City also had a blip season. Up until last season, city and ourselves have had equivalent points over numerous seasons. The highest around Europe.

I've opened a thread about our title race and squad comparison with city. I'm bullish based on the players available to both managers. I can understand some others might prefer city's squad over ours.

Klopps up against Pep, you must surely be expecting a LFC title this year, now at least ?

I hope we can compete for one CC - but we have no right to. Not - imo - with what we have spent. I am acutely aware however that Jurgen is capable of miracles. He performed at Mainz - Dortmund and has followed those up at Liverpool.

We live in hope.

[Steveo]

Just a couple of points on net spend - and I want to be clear here, I am not advocating "cheaping out" at every possible opportunity as there are definitely times to spend etc - that said, the net spend chart -

- Doesn't factor in wages.
- Doesn't factor incentivised contracts.
- A club that sells well may not look "good" on a net spend table if you measure good spending as big spending.
- Doesn't factor in the poor spending choices of the big spenders who have had to keep buying in certain areas (Pep with full-backs for example) due to not nailing their recruitment.

Whilst we have definitely spent conservatively at times, we have also afforded the ability not to have to spend as big or as often partly because we (mostly) recruit incredibly well.

All true but still...

The net spend is low and Klopp - the man who is overwhelmingly responsible for our success has cited the need to take more risks on a few occasions despite being extremely careful NOT to expose his employers.

[JockStrap]

Crap as is usual from you.

For a start I have not been quick to insult anyone. I have tried to remain cordial - many others have told Knob-Jockey far worse and far sooner..yet starngly you choose my comment to pick out - Why...?

Cause you know what I think of you.. and you Farid

For the record. I told someone who refuses to see what is put CLEARLY before him - again and again - to at least write in English or do one. Someone who cannot accept the facts… when presented with them again and again… and who then continues to go to lengths to write his Shyte in a difficult to read unintelligible way,

Take a hike

Ye presented net spend wi' a load o' biased opinion 'n' tried tae pass it all off as facts. Ah exposed that as nonsense 'n' ye dinnae lik' it.

Ye'r clearly incapable o' havin' a debate as evidenced by yer rapid descent in tae childish insults. Pathetic bit then whit sort o' grown man types F$G 'n' thinks he's bein' clever.

[Steveo]

There was no rapid decent as you well know. You speak in your Scot/glish shyte one minute the next you show you can write in the native tongue.

So - this is your last chance... if you genuinely want a response from me...

English or Fuck off

[miller0863]

Said the 12 year old typing in pseudo Scottish …