Originally Posted by
miller0863
Initially he took MacAllister off, brought on Bradley and moved Trent into midfield.
Two errors in one there for a start as Szoboszlai was the one who should have been hooked he was abysmal and Trent should NOT be in midfield.
He then went to a back three with Bradley playing the right side CB having taken Konate off.
We’ve never played with a back three. Took Diaz off and left a woeful Salah on the pitch for 90 minutes.
The changes made no positive impact whatsoever.
Really great summation of the game.
I really hope he doesn't try to force this "back three" style of play on this team as we don't have the personnel that can pull it off.
Bradley is strictly or more naturally a Fullback - and it showed by how he got beaten by Hudson-Odoi first for the goal and then over and over again after that. And unless you want to bring Gomez (who is actually better suited to playing in a back three setup having the ability to play both fullback and centerback) into the starting lineup.
I feel like them going for this back three thing is the club trying to keep Trent in the team or playing full games, since it's pretty apparent and clear that Bradley's a better defender; all while they don't fully want to move Trent to the midfield because, again in that position he's not the best in any of those midfield positions that the club has.
Even Harvey and Jones are better midfielders than Trent is.
In other words, it's just a way for the club (and many fans at the club) to avoid admitting that Trent should not be in that starting lineup.
'I got told there's an English phrase, 'You don't win trophies with kids'. I didn't know that' ... - Jurgen Klopp
Stone-Cold Savage!
Bookmarks