If that’s the case Hughes and Edwards need to be binned
|
|
|
For me the window started well,kerkez(LB)frimpong(RB)wirtz(AM)eritikie(ATTAC K).
although we were sniffing round isak im not sure we really thought it was possible to get isak and ekitikie was available at a price to good to ignore,then imo we found that isak wasnt dead in the water and i also feel that we thought guehi was a done deal,just needing palace to get in a replacement.
Even diaz leaving didnt stop the push for isak and we took our eye off guehi.
If that’s the case Hughes and Edwards need to be binned
If we really thought we could get isak in i think we would have held off from ekitikie and with diaz leaving would/should have moved for a wide attacker and maybe a DM.
Largely agree with that, I've highlighted what I said about Jotas passing and who knows what's gone on behind the scenes. You and Diaz, I imagine are different in that you dont have the means, an agent, and a consequence from your posting photos etc. Didnt look good going out partying whislt others were attending the funeral. I'd have moved on Jota over Nunez, still think both are largely undervalued by many with player ratings provided from the forum for last season. And I have had concerns about Isaks transfer last summer.
Last season.
We lost jota so Ekitike. We then nunez go so isak. It was 2 out and 2 in. I would have preferred the isak money went on a cb and a dm.
I've said it before, this is a long term plan. Short term pain this year for long term gain. All those signings are for the long term, if they work out of coursem
Jota very rarely if ever played wide for us.
If we sell Ekitike, we still need a cf. You can't have 1 cf. If we stick with the 433 we still at least 2 cfs. Ideally you have someone that can play across the front line. Ekitike has the movement to play off the left or right.
Also, isak injury record wasn't brilliant at Newcastle so we will need someone else. Ekitike will do just fine here.
As of now, it's isak that should be worried.